Farm Management Farmland Eminent domain concerns cloud pipeline proposals Three carbon capture and sequestration pipelines are proposed to crisscross the Midwest, collecting CO2 from ethanol plants and other partners. By Cassidy Walter Cassidy Walter Cassidy Walter joined Successful Farming in 2022 to cover commodity markets and agribusiness. Previously, she spent more than five years as the Communications Director for the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, where her work supported Iowa biofuels producers and farmers. Successful Farming's Editorial Guidelines Published on September 5, 2022 Close Photo: USDA Three carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) pipelines are proposed to crisscross the Midwest, collecting CO2 from ethanol plants and other partners to permanently isolate it underground. Stakeholder response has ranged from dissent to praise, but the possible use of eminent domain has landowners particularly fired up. "Unfortunately, [eminent domain] has been painted and mischaracterized as something that is a trump card, and that is absolutely not the case," says Elizabeth Burns-Thompson, vice president of government and public affairs at Navigator CO2 Ventures, one of the three pipeline companies. READ MORE: Third carbon pipeline would traverse several eastern Iowa counties Many landowners have expressed concern eminent domain, the right of government to take private property for public use, will be abused to bring these pipelines to fruition. "From a sheer business perspective, eminent domain doesn't save us time, doesn't save us money, and doesn't build good relationships with the folks we're trying to work with," Burns-Thompson says. "It just makes sense for us to navigate the process in a collaborative, voluntary fashion as much as possible." Summit Carbon Solutions and Wolf Carbon Solutions, the other pipeline companies, have expressed a similar sentiment. Wolf intends to replicate its success of a line built in Alberta, Canada, without eminent domain. Source of Fear Garth Griffin and his father have negotiated easements on his land for three different pipeline projects. The New Hampton, Iowa farmer also went through an eminent domain proceeding when the State of Iowa was widening a road. READ MORE: Farmers for the Future: Doing things differently He felt the state wasn't treating him fairly. The Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) agreed and increased his compensation for the parcel. Griffin recently refused to negotiate with a CCS pipeline agent over a parcel he owns near a residential area. He says the company has since rearranged the route, but originally he was told the land would just be taken by eminent domain. If it came to that, Griffin knows his rights as a landowner. He worries about farmers who don't. "You say these words [eminent domain] and they are shaking at their ankles," he says. "They're throwing a lot of money around, and it's very easy for the farmer to take it." What Landowners Should Know While every state has its own process for handling eminent domain, Todd Janzen, president of Janzen Schroeder Agricultural Law, confirmed landowners have the right to be compensated for use of their land at fair market value. Also, while the pipeline company is paying for the use of the land, the farmer still owns the land. "Ultimately, once the pipeline is in and functioning, if it's running on a cornfield, you should be able to raise corn on that field without any hiccups," Janzen says. In Iowa, a state touched by all three proposed projects, requests for eminent domain are handled by IUB, and landowners have the opportunity to oppose the move in a formal hearing. Summit has begun filing eminent domain requests for 60% of its planned route in Iowa. Jesse Harris, director of public affairs at Summit, says this is a standard part of the process before a permit hearing but the company remains focused on negotiating voluntary easements. Protecting Land Hand in hand with eminent domain are concerns about land restoration. In the wake of the installation of the Dakota Access Pipeline, the State of Iowa updated regulations on how land must be restored following pipeline installation. Burns-Thompson describes the updates as "refined restoration regulations." She notes other states have similar restoration standards that are regularly updated. "Our charge is to leave that property at or in better condition than how we found it," she says. Landowners and CCS companies alike emphasize the importance of communication and listening to landowners' concerns about the entire process. "I welcome all the tough questions and I hope we will continue to have these conversations," Burns-Thompson says. "I come from an Iowa farm. I absolutely understand the value that goes into the land is more than just dollars and cents." Why Capture Carbon? Supporters of the CCS pipelines say their use will secure a future for ethanol and corn demand as the world seeks to decarbonize. "The bottom line is more and more of our markets, both domestically and internationally, are demanding lower carbon biofuels," says Monte Shaw, executive director of the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association. "If we want to continue to provide demand for Iowa farmers and be able to run these plants and add value to the corn, we're going to have to find ways to reduce our carbon intensity score." Kelly Nieuwenhuis farms near Primghar, Iowa, and has already signed an agreement with Summit. Five parcels of land on his family farm are in the path of Summit and Navigator pipelines. He serves on the board of directors for Siouxland Energy Cooperative, an ethanol plant near Sioux Center, Iowa. Siouxland is one of 12 ethanol plants in Iowa working with Summit. Nieuwenhuis says his interest in CCS technology began several years ago when he met with directors on the California Air Resources Board on how to increase demand for biofuels in low-carbon markets such as California. "They thought the absolute best thing we could do would be to capture our CO2 emissions and sequester them," he says. Enter Summit with its project proposal. "I thought, Wow this is exactly what we were looking for!" Nieuwenhuis says. Harris says an ethanol plant can knock a game-changing 30 points off its carbon intensity score by sequestering carbon. With improved efficiencies, ethanol from participating plants could be net-zero by the end of the decade, he says. Lance Lillibridge, a farmer from Vinton, Iowa, says he wishes one of the pipelines was coming through his property. "The world is going to decarbonize whether we like it or not, and we can be a leader or we can be a follower," he says. "Being a follower doesn't always work so well." Iowa Utilities Board Eminent Domain Process Don Tormey, director of communications for the Iowa Utilities Board (IUB), provided Successful Farming with an overview of the permitting process for pipelines such as these and what rights landowners have when faced with an eminent domain case. Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! Tell us why! Other Submit Related Articles Iowa Equestrian Ranch Sells for $2 million 3 Tracts of Iowa farmland bring nearly $4 million at auction How this young farmer builds farm stability Iowa land sells for nearly $30,000 per acre Wisconsin organic farm goes for $16,250 per acre What happens when a will doesn’t match a promise? Iowa farmland brings over $26,000 per acre How much U.S. farmland do foreign entities own? Iowa farmland brings in $23,700 per acre Highlights from Q4 2023 farmland sales 2023 Land Report: Who owns the most land in the United States? Arkansas: a case study on enforcement of foreign farmland ownership restrictions Who’s buying Nebraska? After shopping spree, Mormon church is top land purchaser 15 Minutes With a Farmer podcast: Making plans with Mark McLaughlin What does the law say when your neighbor won’t help with fencing? Applications for Iowa's 2024 Beginning Farmer Tax Credit program are open Newsletter Sign Up