Machinery Irrigation Dike it to dam it Furrow diking’s ability to boost yields is also proven to cut water costs. By Dave Mowitz Dave Mowitz In 1982 Dave came to Successful Farming as a senior editor first covering agronomic topics and then machinery. He went on to serve the nation's farmers as executive editor of Successful Farming Magazine and editor of the Ageless Iron Almanac, a bimonthly publication covering the hobby of agricultural collectibles. Dave recently retired from the Successful Farming family but continues to serve the organization as a contributing editor. Successful Farming's Editorial Guidelines Published on January 25, 2011 Close Furrow diking not only saveswater – as has been proven by more than a decade of field research – but alsoslashes irrigation costs, says Russell Nuti of the USDA Agricultural ResearchService. Nuti and team researcherClint Truman, both with the ARS National Peanut Research Laboratory, have beenexploring the use of furrow diking in southeast states where water runoff is aproblem. That team has looked at the effects of furrow diking on water needsand yields. Furrow diking is a tillagesystem where soils are scooped into ridge-like barriers running alongside rowcrops. The ridges hold irrigation and rainwater. Diking During A Drought In one study run by Nuti andTruman, the researchers compared the effects of runoff and erosion in cottonfields with and without furrow diking. They used a rain simulator, whichreplicates rainfall amounts from past storms, and moisture meters thatautomatically determine the soil's water needs. They found that furrowdiking during a moderate drought saved farmers 1 inch of irrigation water peracre, reduced runoff by 28%, and curbed soil erosion. The next year, when droughtconditions were more severe, Nuti and Truman discovered that furrow dikingsaved 5 inches of irrigation water per acre. In a second study, the researcherscompared crop yields, water needs, and the effects of different irrigationrates on tracts of furrow-diked cotton with traditionally tilled cotton. Theyfound that in one of three years, growers could reduce the irrigation rate by athird and still achieve the same yield as a traditional cropping system. Thedifference in yields in this drought year was sufficient to pay for thepractice of furrow diking for 12 years, according to Nuti. Furrow diking has enjoyed along history of proving itself in field tests. A Texas A&M Universitystudy, for example, projected that diking could increase yields in the HighPlains by as much as $87 million a year. The equipment needed for furrow dikingis relatively inexpensive and can be purchased from several manufacturers. Itis also simple enough for farmers to build with materials found in most farmmachinery shops. According to Texas A&M research, the equipment needed toform dikes can pay for itself in just one season with the increased yields fromonly 75 acres of cotton. Furrow diking equipment wasdesigned and tested in the mid-1970s by Bill Lyle, an agricultural engineer atthe Texas A&M research center in Lubbock, Texas. Lyle also designed aplow-out attachment that's placed in front of tractor tires to break down thedikes prior to harvest to smooth the row for harvest equipment. Texas research determinedthat diking just during the growing season could boost grain sorghum yields by5 to 9 bushels per acre and corn yields by 3 to 9 bushels an acre. Furthermore,keeping furrow dikes in place year-round could boost yields 7 to 17 bushels peracre for sorghum and 3½ to 12¾ bushels for corn. The practice may be usefulin other areas of the High Plains to mitigate the effects of short-durationmoisture stress on crop yields. Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! Tell us why! Other Submit